Las urosepsis y su resistencia antimicrobiana
Abstract
En el laboratorio de microbiología del Centro Municipal de Higiene y Epidemiología de Morón se recibieron las muestras para análisis microbiológicos de los municipios del Área Norte de la provincia Ciego de Ávila, se observó en los últimos meses que la positividad de los urocultivos ha disminuido así como ha ocurrido un incremento en el número de cepas resistentes a los antimicrobianos. Con el objetivo de analizar el comportamiento microbiológico de las urosepsis se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo retrospectivo en el período de enero a mayo del año 2011. El universo de trabajo estuvo constituido por todas las muestras de urocultivos recibidas en el laboratorio. Los resultados se exponen en forma de tablas. Se estudiaron 1554 muestras y solo un 22.9% fueron positivas; los gérmenes aislados con mayor frecuencia fueron: escherichia coli (68.2%), estafilococos spp. (13.8%), seguido de otras enterobacterias. La mayor resistencia antimicrobiana ocurre ante las sulfas (91.9%), el ampicillín (90.4%), ácido nalidíxico (58.7%), la ciprofloxacina (41.1%) y en los estafilococos, la penicilina (62.5%) y eritromicina (56.3%). Se necesita tomar conciencia de los daños que provoca el uso inadecuado de la política antimicrobiana con el objetivo de disminuir la resistencia de los microorganismos a los fármacos.Downloads
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms of the License CC Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0):
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The journal is not responsible for the opinions and concepts expressed in the works, which are the exclusive responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the assistance of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request advisable or necessary modifications. Original scientific works are accepted for publication, as are the results of research of interest that have not been published or sent to another journal for the same purpose.
The mention of trademarks of specific equipment, instruments or materials is for identification purposes, and there is no promotional commitment in relation to them, neither by the authors nor by the editor.

















